Amid overspending, Kyoto looks down on threat of bankruptcy


Until last year, Kyoto boasted of being ranked as one of the best, if not the best, places in the world to visit. Polls like that of the American travel magazine Conde Nast in 2020 called the former capital of Japan the best city in the world.

Of Kyoto’s 53.5 million tourists in 2019, around 8.8 million came from overseas. Together, they spent about 1,200 billion yen, the fourth consecutive year that this figure has exceeded 1,000 billion yen.

One estimate showed that the city grew from around 30,000 available rooms in hotels and traditional inns in 2015 to more than 53,000 last year.

But now international tourism to Kyoto has stalled and the city faces bankruptcy by FY 2028. Unless it can figure out how to find an additional 160 billion yen over the next five years, the city said. Mayor Daisaku Kadokawa.

What happened?

Some could attribute Kyoto’s financial woes to the impact of COVID-19 on tourism. However, the mayor puts the lion’s share of the blame elsewhere.

First, Kadokawa and the bureaucrats report a money-losing subway line that opened in 1997. Construction costs were 1.4 times the original budget, while the number of passengers was lower. expectations to.

Second, Kyoto residents aged 70 and over use city buses and the subway for free or at a reduced cost through municipal subsidies. The rapid aging of Kyoto’s population means that more people have benefited from these reductions in recent years, which has added to the city’s bill.

Third, 10% of Kyoto’s population are said to be students. Not only do they get discounts as well, but their universities often qualify for tax breaks, which means less money for the city coffers.

Fourth, Kyoto bureaucrats enjoy high salaries given the tax base, and there are too many of them.

To prevent the city from going bankrupt, the mayor is asking for 21.5 billion yen in pay cuts for bureaucrats and the cut of 550 jobs. He also wants to review various municipal projects and grants totaling 72.1 billion yen, and sell municipal land worth 11.7 billion yen, all over the next five years.

What Kadokawa doesn’t talk about is raising property taxes. There are several reasons why.

Kyoto’s traditional wood machiya (townhouses) are a big part of the city’s appeal for tourists. But from a tax standpoint, the city sees them as weaknesses because they have a lower property tax rate than large modern buildings, and there’s a feeling it’s not worth it – politically or financially. – to target them.

In addition, all of the temples and shrines in the city, whether or not designated as World Heritage Sites, can receive a lot of money from visitors, but they are exempt from local property taxes if they are registered religious corporations. They are also very influential, in particular with the town hall and the assembly of the city. In 1985, when Kyoto imposed a tax on famous temples, there was a bitter legal battle that led to its abolition in 1988.

Kadokawa’s plan drew criticism from neighboring Osaka. The mayor of that city, Ichiro Matsui, suggested that Kadokawa show leadership by cutting his own salary – Matsui himself accepted a 40% salary cut and abolished the mayor’s retirement bonus. So far, Kadokawa has only offered a 30% pay cut and a 16% cut in his retirement bonus.

Kyoto and Osaka have long been rivals, and the two cities have very different characters.

Osaka TV media commentators, after hearing about the Kyoto situation, half-joked that it is typical Kyoto behavior to pretend there are no problems and d ‘hope they disappear. But they’re not laughing at Kyoto, which faces drastic cuts in services for its residents, even though it must also invest more to attract tourists and visitors once the coronavirus pandemic is a thing of the past.

View from Osaka is a monthly column that examines the latest news from a Kansai perspective.

In a time of both disinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us tell the story right.




About Author

Leave A Reply